Why Your Company Learned AI and Went Nowhere
Illustration · not a service recordChien Li-feng names a widespread corporate blind spot: companies pay for AI training, yet competitiveness stands still. The reason is simple — courses can buy Knowledge and drill Skill, but they cannot buy an organization's Attitude, and they certainly cannot buy redesigned processes.
Even the most-cited efficiency legends need a control group. Klarna made headlines by replacing large numbers of support staff with AI, and was later widely reported to be rehiring humans — headline numbers that lack independent audit and the test of time are not a basis for transformation. AI Transformation = AI Adoption + Innovation: adoption without innovation just runs the old process at a higher price.
This is why 問用管造 insists on a three-to-five-year organizational journey, led and modeled personally by leadership, rather than a one-off workshop: capability is practiced into existence, not purchased. Courses are oxygen, not muscle.
Buying courses proves you can afford tuition. Changing processes proves you learned.
- Chien Li-feng on blind spots in corporate AI investment: Manager Today (2026; related reading at the end of the article: 'Paying for Employees to Learn AI While Company Competitiveness Stands Still')[1]
- Cautions for the Klarna case: LEADAI internal principles (cross-check multiple reports when citing; add 2–3 specific external links before publication [Pending])
- AI Transformation = Adoption + Innovation / a 3–5-year transformation: Ray Lu (training for prospective school principals, 2026-04-24)
Course titles follow the source. Check each course page for its teaching language.