Why Your Company Learned AI and Went Nowhere

Chien Li-feng names a widespread corporate blind spot: companies pay for AI training, yet competitiveness stands still. The reason is simple — courses can buy Knowledge and drill Skill, but they cannot buy an organization's Attitude, and they certainly cannot buy redesigned processes.
Even the most-cited efficiency legends need a control group. Klarna made headlines by replacing large numbers of support staff with AI, and was later widely reported to be rehiring humans — headline numbers that lack independent audit and the test of time are not a basis for transformation. AI Transformation = AI Adoption + Innovation: adoption without innovation just runs the old process at a higher price.
This is why 問用管造 insists on a three-to-five-year organizational journey, led and modeled personally by leadership, rather than a one-off workshop: capability is practiced into existence, not purchased. Courses are oxygen, not muscle.
Buying courses proves you can afford tuition. Changing processes proves you learned.
- 簡立峰論企業 AI 投資盲點:經理人(2026) AI,公司競爭力卻原地踏步〉) (文末延伸〈花錢讓員工學[1]
- Klarna 案例注意事項:LEADAI 內部原則(引用時以多方報導交叉,發布前補 2–3 條具體外部連結〔待補〕)
- AI Transformation = Adoption + Innovation/3–5 年轉型:呂冠緯(候用校長研習 2026-04-24)